Some More

Continuing the list:

Reid Forgrave in Des Moines, here, here, and here.

Mike Mooney At the Dallas Morning News, here, here and here.

Emily Richmond at the Las Vegas Sun, here, here and here.

Paul Harasim from the Las Vegas Review-Journal, here, here and here.

Posted by ben on 07/05/07 at 09:27 | Comments (6) | Trackbacks (0)


Comments

Re: Some More

I can tell you from experience that one of the above writers' good work is the result of amazing editing and nothing else.

Posted by: chris at July 06,2007 23:06


Re: Some More

Let us know who you are and criticize directly. This is not a place for cheap shots, bro.

Posted by: ben at July 07,2007 08:02


Re: Some More

Every writer's best work is in some way the result of good editing, directly or indirectly.
Discuss.

Posted by: Bill M. at July 07,2007 09:12


Re: Some More

Similar to my first thoughts after reading Anonymous Chris' potshot: Whose best work ISN'T done thanks to "amazing" editing? I've had some great editors -- I'd say genius editors even -- help me first at the Times Herald-Record and now here at the SPT. The longer I do this, and it hasn't been long, the more I learn: Without good editors, man oh man, good luck doing good stuff.

Posted by: Kruse at July 07,2007 10:43


Re: Some More

I've worked as both a writer and an editor. I've had my battles with editors, and I've also had them save me from embarrassment. A good editor is just your first intelligent reader, who catches your mistakes and lets you know when something isn't working. A great editor is a teacher who not only makes the piece better but makes you a better writer.
At most newspapers I've worked at, there were small circles of like-minded writers who traded things back and forth -- "Does this lead work?" "Where do I go from here?" That is, we edited for one another.
So there's a sense in which none of our work is completely our own.

Posted by: Bill M. at July 07,2007 11:23


Re: Some More

There has to be something there for an editor to work with before good work makes it onto the page. I know as I've tried to get started in this business some of the best experiences I've had with editors are when they've figured out what I was trying to say in the midst of all the surrounding slop. Good editors help you separate that the story line from the filler. But there has to be a story line buried somewhere in the draft or in at least in a notebook before that can happen.
I guess I just don't believe someone terrible can be made elegant without at least some talent for capturing the story somewhere.

Posted by: Doyle at July 07,2007 13:58


None

Post a comment






(include http://)






Type the word in the image: